Raze.bot Developers

Executive Summary

Raze.bot is a multi-wallet Solana trading platform that prioritizes user security through local transaction processing and client-side private key management. This audit documentation demonstrates that Raze.bot implements industry-standard security practices to ensure that private keys never leave the user’s device and all sensitive operations are performed locally.

🔐 Core Security Principles

1. Local Private Key Management

Private keys are generated, stored, and used exclusively on the client-side:

Aspect	Implementation
Key Generation	New wallets are created using Solana’s `Keypair.generate()` method locally in the browser
Key Storage	Private keys are encrypted using AES encryption before storage
Key Usage	Transaction signing occurs entirely in the browser using local keypairs
Zero Server Transmission	Private keys are never sent to any server or external service

2. Client-Side Transaction Signing

All transaction signing happens locally in the user’s browser:

// Transaction signing is performed locally
const signTransaction = (transactionBase58: string, privateKey: string): string => {
  // Create keypair from private key (locally)
  const keypair = web3.Keypair.fromSecretKey(bs58.decode(privateKey));

  // Deserialize transaction
  const txBuffer = bs58.decode(transactionBase58);
  const transaction = web3.VersionedTransaction.deserialize(txBuffer);

  // Sign the transaction locally
  transaction.sign([keypair]);

  // Return signed transaction
  return bs58.encode(transaction.serialize());
};

3. Encrypted Local Storage

Wallet data is encrypted before storage:

Feature	Details
Encryption Method	AES encryption using CryptoJS
Storage Locations	IndexedDB (primary) and localStorage (backup)
Key Protection	Encryption key is hardcoded in client code (standard for client-side apps)
Migration Support	Automatic migration from unencrypted to encrypted storage

🛡️ Security Architecture

Transaction Flow Security

Unsigned Transaction Request

Client requests unsigned transaction from server
Server returns transaction template without signatures
No private keys involved in this step

Local Transaction Signing

Client deserializes unsigned transaction
Private key is used locally to sign transaction
Signed transaction is serialized for transmission

Signed Transaction Submission

Only the signed transaction is sent to server
Server forwards to Jito Bundle Service or RPC
Private keys remain on client device

Wallet Management Security

Wallet Creation

export const createNewWallet = async (): Promise<WalletType> => {
  const keypair = Keypair.generate(); // Local generation
  const address = keypair.publicKey.toString();
  const privateKey = bs58.encode(keypair.secretKey);

  return {
    id: Date.now(),
    address,
    privateKey, // Stored locally only
    isActive: false
  };
};

Wallet Import

export const importWallet = async (
  privateKeyString: string
): Promise<{ wallet: WalletType | null; error?: string }> => {
  // Validation and keypair creation happens locally
  const privateKeyBytes = bs58.decode(privateKeyString);
  const keypair = Keypair.fromSecretKey(privateKeyBytes);
  const address = keypair.publicKey.toString();

  // Private key remains in local memory only
  return { 
    wallet: { 
      id: Date.now(), 
      address, 
      privateKey: privateKeyString, 
      isActive: false 
    } 
  };
};

Data Encryption Implementation

// Encryption utilities
const encryptData = (data: string): string => {
  return CryptoJS.AES.encrypt(data, ENCRYPTION_KEY).toString();
};

const decryptData = (encryptedData: string): string => {
  const bytes = CryptoJS.AES.decrypt(encryptedData, ENCRYPTION_KEY);
  return bytes.toString(CryptoJS.enc.Utf8);
};

// Secure wallet storage
export const saveWalletsToCookies = (wallets: WalletType[]): void => {
  const walletData = JSON.stringify(wallets);
  const encryptedData = encryptData(walletData); // Encrypt before storage
  localStorage.setItem(ENCRYPTED_STORAGE_KEY, encryptedData);
};

🔍 Security Audit Findings

✅ Strengths

Local Key Management

Private keys are generated using secure Solana libraries
Keys never leave the client environment
All cryptographic operations performed locally

Transaction Security

Transactions are signed client-side using local keypairs
Only signed transactions are transmitted to servers
No private key exposure during transaction processing

Data Protection

Wallet data encrypted using AES before storage
Multiple storage backends (IndexedDB + localStorage)
Automatic migration from unencrypted to encrypted storage

Code Transparency

Open-source codebase allows for public security review
Clear separation between client and server responsibilities
Well-documented security practices

⚠️ Considerations

Client-Side Encryption KeyEncryption key is embedded in client code (standard limitation for client-side apps). Users should be aware that client-side encryption protects against casual access, not determined attackers with code access.

Browser Security DependencySecurity relies on browser’s built-in protections. Users should use updated browsers and avoid compromised devices.

Phishing ProtectionUsers must verify they’re using the official Raze.bot domain. No additional phishing protection mechanisms implemented.

🛠️ Security Dependencies

Core Security Libraries

Library	Purpose
@solana/web3.js	Official Solana library for blockchain interactions
bs58	Base58 encoding/decoding for Solana addresses and keys
crypto-js	AES encryption for local data protection
js-cookie	Secure cookie management

Security-Relevant Dependencies

{
  "@solana/web3.js": "^1.95.8",
  "bs58": "^6.0.0",
  "crypto-js": "^4.2.0",
  "js-cookie": "^3.0.5"
}

🔒 Best Practices Implemented

1. Principle of Least Privilege

Server only receives unsigned transaction templates and signed transactions
No unnecessary data transmission
Minimal server-side private data handling

2. Defense in Depth

Multiple storage mechanisms (IndexedDB + localStorage)
Encryption at rest
Client-side validation and error handling

3. Secure Development Practices

TypeScript for type safety
Comprehensive error handling
Input validation for private keys and transactions

📋 Security Checklist

Private keys generated locally using secure libraries

Private keys never transmitted to servers

All transaction signing performed client-side

Wallet data encrypted before storage

Multiple storage backends for redundancy

Open-source code for transparency

Secure dependency management

Proper error handling and validation

Clear separation of client/server responsibilities

🔍 Competitor Security Analysis

Overview

To provide context for Raze.bot’s security approach, we analyzed how major Solana trading bot competitors handle private keys and transaction security. This comparison highlights the varying approaches to user security in the trading bot ecosystem.

Security Trade-offs Analysis

Feature	Raze.bot	BullX	GMGN	Photon	Axiom	Padre (Terminal)
Local Key Storage	✅	❌	❌	❓	❌	❌
Client-Side Signing	✅	❓	❓	❓	❓	❓
Zero Server Transmission	✅	❌	❌	❌	❌	❌
Open Source Security	✅	❌	❌	❌	❌	❌

✅ = Implemented, ❌ = Not implemented, ❓ = Unclear/Unverified

🎯 Conclusion

Raze.bot implements a security-first architecture that ensures:

Private keys remain local

Never transmitted or stored on servers

Local transaction signing

All cryptographic operations performed in the browser

Encrypted storage

Wallet data protected at rest

Transparent security

Open-source code allows for public audit

Compared to competitors, Raze.bot offers the most secure approach to private key management by keeping all sensitive operations local to the user’s device. While some competitors offer additional features like MEV protection, Raze.bot’s focus on fundamental security principles provides users with the highest level of asset protection.

Users can confidently use Raze.bot knowing that their private keys and sensitive data remain under their complete control on their local device.

📞 Security Contact

For security-related questions or to report vulnerabilities:

GitHub Issues

Prefix with [SECURITY]

Support Center

Contact support directly

This security audit documentation demonstrates Raze.bot’s commitment to user security and transparency. The platform’s architecture ensures that users maintain complete control over their private keys while providing a seamless trading experience.

Solana UI

Trading Server

Iframe Integration

Audit

Executive Summary

🔐 Core Security Principles

1. Local Private Key Management

2. Client-Side Transaction Signing

3. Encrypted Local Storage

🛡️ Security Architecture

Transaction Flow Security

Wallet Management Security

Wallet Creation

Wallet Import

Data Encryption Implementation

🔍 Security Audit Findings

✅ Strengths

⚠️ Considerations

🛠️ Security Dependencies

Core Security Libraries

Security-Relevant Dependencies

🔒 Best Practices Implemented

1. Principle of Least Privilege

2. Defense in Depth

3. Secure Development Practices

📋 Security Checklist

🔍 Competitor Security Analysis

Overview

Security Trade-offs Analysis

🎯 Conclusion

Private keys remain local

Local transaction signing

Encrypted storage

Transparent security

📞 Security Contact

GitHub Issues

Support Center

Solana UI

Trading Server

Iframe Integration

​Executive Summary

​🔐 Core Security Principles

​1. Local Private Key Management

​2. Client-Side Transaction Signing

​3. Encrypted Local Storage

​🛡️ Security Architecture

​Transaction Flow Security

​Wallet Management Security

​Wallet Creation

​Wallet Import

​Data Encryption Implementation

​🔍 Security Audit Findings

​✅ Strengths

​⚠️ Considerations

​🛠️ Security Dependencies

​Core Security Libraries

​Security-Relevant Dependencies

​🔒 Best Practices Implemented

​1. Principle of Least Privilege

​2. Defense in Depth

​3. Secure Development Practices

​📋 Security Checklist

​🔍 Competitor Security Analysis

​Overview

​Security Trade-offs Analysis

​🎯 Conclusion

Private keys remain local

Local transaction signing

Encrypted storage

Transparent security

​📞 Security Contact

GitHub Issues

Support Center

Executive Summary

🔐 Core Security Principles

1. Local Private Key Management

2. Client-Side Transaction Signing

3. Encrypted Local Storage

🛡️ Security Architecture

Transaction Flow Security

Wallet Management Security

Wallet Creation

Wallet Import

Data Encryption Implementation

🔍 Security Audit Findings

✅ Strengths

⚠️ Considerations

🛠️ Security Dependencies

Core Security Libraries

Security-Relevant Dependencies

🔒 Best Practices Implemented

1. Principle of Least Privilege

2. Defense in Depth

3. Secure Development Practices

📋 Security Checklist

🔍 Competitor Security Analysis

Overview

Security Trade-offs Analysis

🎯 Conclusion

📞 Security Contact